[Linux-disciples] Conf files
Adam Rosi-Kessel
adam at rosi-kessel.org
Fri Jul 16 21:34:44 EDT 2004
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 09:17:46PM -0400, Stephen R Laniel wrote:
> When a package tells me that there's a new conf file
> available, but that I've configured my own version of that
> conf file on disk, I get nervous: if I keep the on-disk
> version -- which I invariably do -- am I going to miss some
> important update? Apparently /etc/apache/httpd.conf has just
> been updated, but I've thoroughly tweaked my own httpd.conf;
> I'm not going to overwrite it.
>
> Should I worry when I don't grab the newest versions?
> Presumably well-behaved programs don't put anything crucial
> in a conf file that probably won't be used. But should I be
> concerned?
You should do <d> for diff and see what's changed. Sometimes programs
must break compatibility with old config files for various reasons.
Sometimes the Debian maintainer tries to automate the config upgrade.
Three isn't really a one-size fits all solution; you should just see what
the change is and decide for yourself if it's important.
--
Adam Rosi-Kessel
http://adam.rosi-kessel.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.bostoncoop.net/pipermail/linux-disciples/attachments/20040716/646eee01/attachment.pgp
More information about the Linux-disciples
mailing list