[*BCM*] Meaningless Labelling (was: Scooters in the bike lanes)

[ThoM3 at aol.com]

I'm not so sure about #2, thus why I started this thread (legality in  
lanes). If you're talking a head on collision, I would def have to agree with  you.



In a message dated 9/27/2007 1:10:06 AM Eastern Daylight Time,  
jchase at chaselimited.com writes:

I  understand what you are saying about the small scooters, but I
think the  argument about pollution is trumped by a number of
benefits scooters have  over autos:

1) Scooters use far less fuel
2) Scooters aren't nearly  as much a danger to pedestrians or cyclists (as 
cars)
3) Scooters don't  contribute to traffic congestion nearly as much as cars

Personally I  wouldn't want a scooter at CM either, but my reason for not
wanting them  there would be because riding it around in the mass would
simply be a waste  of fuel.

Jeremy







************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.bostoncoop.net/pipermail/bostoncriticalmass/attachments/20070927/424f736c/attachment.htm