[Linux-disciples] Question about syntax using mv

[Adam Rosi-Kessel]

Stephen R Laniel wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 02:43:05PM -0400, Jason Smith wrote:
>> Is that the same as either option I suggested just far more elegant?
> I don't think it is. I believe
> mv ~/foo /bar/foo
> is going to create a directory called /bar/foo/foo .

Right. I think Jason might have been asking about the effect of trailing
slash, which I believe is nil in this case. A trailing slash in the
destination path will make a difference with rsync, however.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 250 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.bostoncoop.net/pipermail/linux-disciples/attachments/20051018/74c5ea02/signature.pgp