[Linux-disciples] Compiling from source -- config options
Adam Rosi-Kessel
adam at rosi-kessel.org
Mon Oct 17 17:24:33 EDT 2005
Stephen R Laniel wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 05:18:58PM -0400, Adam Rosi-Kessel wrote:
>> (3) If your really wanted to do the above, you would do
>>
>> sudo ./configure --with-mail-gid=mailman
>>
>> (3)(a) You shouldn't generally have "dot" in your path; it can be a security
>> hole.
> I don't have '.' in my path, per Dylan's recommendation some
> months ago:
> http://lists.bostoncoop.net/pipermail/linux-disciples/2005-June/001359.html
> 'configure' isn't in the install dir or any of its subdirs.
Hmm. Well, the standard thing is to have a "configure" file and a
"Makefile." That's old school, anyway. You run ./configure first and then make.
Modern and more complex packages tend to use autoconf/automake/autotools,
which I don't fully understand, but usually there will be something like a
configure.in or configure.am and you can run autogen or something like that
to get it to work.
This is where my actually knowledge of how to do things ends and my "poking
around until it works" begins. But it's really not to hard. I do know that
I've never done anything like make configure in the hundreds of packages
I've built.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 250 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.bostoncoop.net/pipermail/linux-disciples/attachments/20051017/d8581be6/signature.pgp
More information about the Linux-disciples
mailing list