<p>Hello,</p>
<p>I think Yuki sums up things well. The sad part is Yuki right some people just stop riding all together if they feel that their route or part of it is dangerous. </p>
<p><blockquote>On Dec 16, 2008 7:07 PM, "Hiroyuki Yamada" <<a href="mailto:hyamada@mit.edu">hyamada@mit.edu</a>> wrote:<br><br>+1, with an addendum<br>
<br>
Riding into boston, I rarely feel like I am actually in danger, except<br>
for certain areas -- parts of commonwealth can be dark, fast, and<br>
narrow, and some side streets can often be too narrow for their own good<br>
(for even 1 single lane of cars, let alone a car and a bike). Mostly,<br>
the city is ok. The problem with only having bike lanes in the outlying<br>
suburbs is that it creates inconsistency and makes inexperienced<br>
cyclists confused or those uncomfortable riding in the street nervous to<br>
do so -- they then take to the sidewalk (thinking perhaps that they are<br>
*supposed* to, or that it's safer there), or don't ride at all. A<br>
classic example of this is southbound on the Mass Ave bridge //-- the<br>
bike lane ends all of a sudden, with no warning (actually, come to think<br>
of it there *may* be a sign there, I don't remember seeing it though),<br>
and quite frequently I am tailing someone just as we cross the bridge,<br>
and watch as they pull up onto the sidewalk as the bike lane ends --<br>
right into a bus stop! It might also be partly that right there the road<br>
becomes kinda shitey (the entrance to the parking lot behind beacon),<br>
but I think it has at least partly to do with the lane disappearing.<br>
<br>
As for bikes being legal vehicles on the road, yes that's true, but<br>
there's a difference between law, and common perception/action. If an<br>
area is way unsafe for bikes, people will simply not bike there. You'll<br>
get a few fixsters and messengers using it, and people who /have/ to,<br>
but people will largely ride around, or just NOT ride at all, and take<br>
the T or drive. Given that this IS the first renovation in several<br>
decades (of that area), and it's unlikely there will be another one in<br>
quite a few years, it'd probably make sense to put in a bike lane this<br>
time around.<br>
<br>
--Yuki<br>
<p><font color="#500050">
Antony Rudie wrote:
> someone said:
>
> It looks to me like whomever is suing the city doesn't ge...</font></p>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Boston Critical Mass mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:list@bostoncriticalmass.org">list@bostoncriticalmass.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://bostoncriticalmass.org/list" target="_blank">http://bostoncriticalmass.org/list</a><br>
> To unsubscribe email <a href="mailto:list-unsubscribe@bostoncriticalmass.org">list-unsubscribe@bostoncriticalmass.org</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Boston Critical Mass mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:list@bostoncriticalmass.org">list@bostoncriticalmass.org</a><br>
<a href="http://bostoncriticalmass.org/list" target="_blank">http://bostoncriticalmass.org/list</a><br>
To unsubscribe email <a href="mailto:list-unsubscribe@bostoncriticalmass.org">list-unsubscribe@bostoncriticalmass.org</a><br>
</blockquote></p>