<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<font size="-1"><font face="Verdana">There's nothing WRONG with them,
but it's 2007. There's nothing WRONG with gopher or nntp either;
They're just obsolete.<br>
<br>
I have come to accept that some people like me are always trying to use
the latest and greatest thing out there, even though it may not be the
most stable solution to a problem, then there are people that never
consider upgrading/replacing anything unless there is a clear problem
with what is in place regardless of the features available in newer
solutions. Both have their advantages and disadvantages, but I would be
willing to bet that the average user will be more likely to participate
in something if it has a modern aesthetic appeal on top of
functionality.<br>
<br>
</font></font>Maitland Lederer wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid20070411185909.GE4825@sammy.net" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 02:57:54PM -0400, Mars wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">spamscreened by my server, and there is no way for newcomers to view
previous topics.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
What's wrong with the archives?
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>