Wed Feb 13 23:09:11 EST 2008
> > which list or lists do you refer to?
-- which asks where one might see the "other email lists" *you* refer
to. And that's a valid question, since it goes directly to the source
for your assertion.
Do you favor us with an answer? Oh, heck, no! Instead, you puff-up
an indignant little tantrum:
> =v= You can't even apologize for your unwarranted, inaccurate,
> off-topic attack and then you demand to know yet more material
> to use to bore this list with additional flaming metadiscussion?
-- a tantrum that is, itself, an off-topic metadiscussion. It's also
another attempt to change the subject away from my encouraging you to
own and explain *your own words*. Clever! But it's not "more
material" -- it's what *you* wrote in the first place!
You won't back up your assertion, of course, because you can't. And
if you stayed on-topic, you would have to admit you've libeled
MassBike. So your answers are evasive.
Well, your evasions are noted. I won't ask you again.
But sure, I'll join you on ending this. Yes, game over -- please!
Your drive-by libel game isn't fun for anyone ... not even you, I bet.
So like you, I'm done!
More information about the Bostoncriticalmass