[*BCM*] GPS for Bikes
jeremychase at gmail.com
Fri Feb 1 11:45:03 EST 2008
RF would be a lot more reliable too.. No satellites required, and from
standpoint it is much better too.. The last thing I want is GPS telling exactly
where I am all the time.
In either case I think the problem is two fold.
1) Need a frequency alloted for a low bandwidth signal
2) Need to resolve the battery issue of the transmitter. A couple AA
batteries sending a beacon is going to have significant draw..
Coincidentally I am studying for my amateur radio general license.
On Feb 1, 2008 11:36 AM, Mars <martian at mit.edu> wrote:
> That is a great idea, but RF would be more reliable and feasible.
> Boston Critical Mass mailing list
> list at bostoncriticalmass.org
> To unsubscribe email list-unsubscribe at bostoncriticalmass.org
More information about the Bostoncriticalmass