[*BCM*] Op/Ed

[Anne Wolfe]

The Landmarks Commission's argument IS slippery.  Which is why it needs to
be fought with something that doesn't give them any ground to let them oil
out of their responsibilities to the public etc.  Tough to do in short
words, but then why use those words to give them the oil?

It was a great start.  Better to have something in public than nothing -
just keep building on it!


On 28/11/06, Jym Dyer <jym at econet.org> wrote:
>
> > The comment is in response to a department in the city that
> > has no business blocking the installation.
>
> =v= Yeah, really.  They fret over bike racks but have no qualms
> about ahistorical-looking parking meters (neither the bulky new
> style or the old style), nor even the ahistorical freakin' cars
> themselves.  Pathetic.
>    <_Jym_>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Boston Critical Mass mailing list
> list at bostoncriticalmass.org
> http://bostoncriticalmass.org/list
> To unsubscribe email list-unsubscribe at bostoncriticalmass.org
>



-- 
Anne Wolfe, LL.M.
Mobile: ( 077484) 76599
Nothing can be compared to a faithful friend, and no weight of gold and
silver is able to countervail the goodness of his fidelity.  -
Ecclesiasticus
Certes, Toto, sentio nos in Kansate non iam adesse. - D. Gale
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.bostoncoop.net/pipermail/bostoncriticalmass/attachments/20061129/612c1216/attachment.htm